BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #49

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“In I Kings 2: 3-4, King David charges his son, Solomon, soon to become king himself, in this way: “And keep the charge of the Lord your God, to walk in His ways, to keep His statutes, His commandments, His ordinances, and His testimonies, according to what is written in the law of Moses, that you may succeed in all that you do and wherever you turn, so that the Lord may carry out His promise which He spoke concerning me, saying, ‘If your sons are careful of their way, to walk before Me in truth with all their heart and with all their soul, you shall not lack a man on the throne of Israel’.”  The terms ‘way’ and
‘walk’ are synonymous with how one lives. It is significant to note that walking before the Lord in truth is closely linked with the desire in one’s heart. “But who knows the heart of a man except the spirit of the man.”  <st1:bcv_smarttag>Matthew  22: 16 reveals that our Lord Jesus Christ was known to be dedicated to truth: “And they (Pharisees) sent their disciples to Him, along with the Herodians, saying, `Teacher, we know that You are truthful and teach the way of God in truth, and defer to no one; for You are not partial to
any.”  How did the Pharisees come by this knowledge?  Recall that in John 3: 1 – 21, we read the account of the Lord’s encounter with the emissary of the Pharisees, Nicodemus.  Nicodemus’ opening salutation to Jesus states: “Rabbi (teacher of the truth), we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs (these empirically inexplicable works of power) that You do unless God is with him.””

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #46

This entry represents a break in the flow of releasing the book, “Discipleship and Discipline”, by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005. This entry is in response to a request from my friend, Dr. Leslie Petrovics, Budapest, Hungary, on the subject, “Can Liberal Christianity Be Saved?”, an article in the NY Times, July 14, 2012, by Ross Douthat:

“CAN LIBERAL CHRISTIANITY BE SAVED? A REASONED (HOPEFULLY) RESPONSE

By William H. Hicks, BA, MPH, Elder, Living Stones Ministry Church of God

Chattanooga, TN

September 27, 2012

My long-distance friend, Dr. Leslie Petrovics, Budapest, Hungary and Mount Hermon classmate, 1967, referenced the article in the NY Times, July 15, 2012 by Ross Douthat, and solicited my views on the matter. First, I am humbled and honored that Dr. Petrovics would even consider my views as worth hearing.  I am pleased to offer to you, Les, the product of considerable thought on the subject. I hope you find this stimulating (at least).

In the book, “Discipleship and Discipline”, by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005, is written the following taken from the introduction:

“This book is written to challenge the church to be what it is meant to be: the greatest, single most potent change agent in the history of the world- past, present and future- because the church was made to change the hearts of men. The church has lost sight of its vision, if not of its mission. We are fragmented by denominations, by doctrinal infidelity, by stultifying institutional rictus and structural decay. Mega-churches proliferate and compete for numbers but do nothing to reach and teach the individual souls God says “all are mine.”(Ezekiel 18: 4) We are charged by Christ to have two (2) elements to our job description as disciples: we are to make disciples and we are to be His witnesses. The church is failing at making disciples, failing at teaching the professed followers of Christ “all that He has commanded us”. The church is fragmented, disjointed, at odds with itself and with His Word. It is failing to “equip the saints for the work of service”. The church lacks power because few are following His instructions on the imperative and method to make disciples. Consequently, witnessing has been relegated to attending church on Sunday at 11:00AM which remains the most segregated hour in America. We can do better. We must do better. Each of us who confess to be followers of Jesus Christ must first become His disciples and then we must apply the discipline of disciples to the making of other disciples and to our task as witnesses for Him. This book is a call to the church to assess itself, to “re-form” itself to conform more precisely to the change agent Jesus Christ called her into being to be.”

Jesus Christ embodied a personal relationship, direct with God. People desire, in my view, require this “propinquity”. (John 1: 12 – 13). The church/Christianity largely has failed to be truthful/faithful to its original “raison d’etre” and this failure is reflected in its “lack of success” by worldly measures, i.e., declining attendance, fewer “devotees”. In America, politics has “over-ruled” doctrinal fidelity. “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s”. This is not limited to America. “Church Closes Food Bank Because It Attracts Poor People!”, an article in the Ottowa Citizen, Sept 1, 2011: “Winnipeg: A busy church food bank, known for offering warm drinks and snacks to its regulars, has announced its closing because it is attracting too many poor people. “‘It’s attracting a lot of street people that make it uncomfortable,’ said Charlotte Prossen, Unity Truth Centre minister Thursday, ‘It’s creating social unrest in the church’. “‘A food bank is a social service and that is not who we are.“ Ms. Prossen said the program is being cancelled to focus on more church-specific activities. The church’s board of trustees made the decision to cancel the bimonthly food bank after receiving an e-mail from a sister church in Victoria. ‘Most clients of food banks have not yet come to a sense of personal responsibility in life. They are still in denial, blame or seeing the world as owing them,’ wrote Rev. David Durksen of the Unity Church of Victoria.

Douthat writes that the church “is flexible to the point of indifference on dogma, friendly to sexual liberation in almost every form, willing to blend Christianity with other faiths and eager to downplay theology entirely in favor of secular political causes.” He further states, “The most successful Christian bodies have often been politically conservative but theologically shallow, preaching a gospel of health and wealth rather than the full New Testament message.” If we take this as Douthat’s definition of ‘liberal Christianity’, my questions are: does this (Christianity) really exist? And if so, is it worth saving? Recently, I preached a sermon entitled, “Straight Talk About the So-called ‘Prosperity Gospel’”. During that homily, I stated, “I have been concerned about the disciples being led astray by the so-called “prosperity gospel” which teaches that one’s “abundant life” on earth is tied to the “amount” of faith one has and that that same faith and abundance is manifested in material and/or physical wellbeing. According to some of the proponents/teachers of this “gospel”, one’s faith can be measured by the NUMBER of Rolls Royce autos they possess or the NUMBER of houses they own or the NUMBER of members that attend their church (NOT INCLUDING THE INFLUENTIAL ONES!) or the NUMBER of square feet their sanctuary covers (not including the acreage on which the facility rests!) or HOW LARGE their annual budget is or how few (IF ANY) days they have been ill. Rarely, if ever, do you hear them talking about the NUMBER OF CHANGED LIVES they can give account for, largely because this is very difficult to measure. In order to do so, you would have to trace the impact of their teaching on the QUALITY (not QUANTITY) of their adherents’ lives OVER TIME.” Church attendance figures are NOT CHRIST’S STANDARD/MEASURE OF SUCCESS. I agree (in part) with Douthat, when he says, “The defining idea of liberal Christianity- that faith should spur social reform as well as personal conversion- has been an immensely positive force in our national life. No one should wish for its extinction, or for a world where Christianity becomes the exclusive property of the political right.” Where we diverge- and maybe only slightly- is that I believe personal conversion is the SOURCE of social reform, not its companion.  Douthat references “liberal Protestant scholar Gary Dorrien” who, he says, “points out (that) the Christianity that animated causes such as the Social Gospel and the Civil Rights Movement was much more dogmatic (doctrinally sound? True?) than present-day liberal faith. Its leaders had a “deep grounding in Bible study, family devotions, personal prayer and worship” Douthat posits that “They argued for progressive reform in the context of a “personal transcendent God..the divinity of Christ, the need for personal redemption and the importance of Christian missions.” These characteristics of ‘liberal Christianity’ point backwards to a personal relationship with God, which was central to the gospel (Then He said to them all, “ If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me.”—Luke 9: 23) and to the Apostle Paul’s teachings.

I had the distinct pleasure of hearing a seminar presented by Taylor Branch, Pulitzer Prize winning author (History) for his work, “Parting the Waters: America in the King Years, 1954-63 (Simon & Schuster: 1988). After his remarks, I asked Mr. Branch this question: “Do you think/believe that the Black church can become again the crucible of moral and theological leadership that produced Dr. King?” Mr. Branch’s reply was, “I honestly don’t know”. Can ‘liberal’ Christianity be saved? Only if Christianity as a sending (Romans 10: 15) and the individuals in churches in particular and as a whole, return to their roots, to its mission, its stated reason for being, that is, “to make disciples”. Unless and until the church re-focuses on its Master and fosters, encourages, promotes and teaches towards implementation His principles, it will continue to become irrelevant in the lives of the individual souls God says “all are mine.””

Posted in MODERN CHRISTIANITY | Tagged , | 3 Comments

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #45

From “Discipleship and Discipline”, by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

““Scriptural study on this element of discipline- dedication to truth- helps to edify us and elucidate the practical applications of the truth contained in God’s Word.  <st1:bcv_smarttag>Proverbs 23: 23 says, “Buy truth (Hebrew definition) and do not sell it, get wisdom and instruction and understanding.”  <st1:bcv_smarttag>Matthew 13:44, the Lord’s parable of the hidden treasure, says, “The kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, which a man found and hid; and from joy over it he goes and sells all that he has, and buys that field.”  In each instance, we see that the truth is so highly valued, that one is encouraged to sell all he has to obtain it and to not relinquish it for any price.

In the process of being dedicated to the truth, a disciple must be taught the truth.  This is the role of the Teacher/discipler.  The point of the Teacher’s teaching is the practical application of what is being taught- “Here’s how you do it!”   The disciple’s role is to be teachable, to be willing to be taught the truth AND to perform, to apply the teaching to his life.  In <st1:bcv_smarttag>John 6: 45, Jesus said, “It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught of God.’ Everyone who has heard and learns from the Father, comes to Me.”  As He goes on to state the truth that He is “the bread of life” and that His disciples must ‘eat His flesh and drink His blood’, “Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, ‘This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?’   The greek word for listen, akouo, means to hear with the clear intent to apply what is heard.  Thus, some of Jesus’ disciples did not have the faith to apply the whole truth to their lives.  Jesus’ response to their hesitation is to ask them, “Does this cause you to stumble?” (John 6: 61)  Jesus, in essence, was asking the disciples if they were embarrassed of Him and His truth.  “But there are some of you who do not believe.” (John 6: 64)”

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #44

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“Scientists admit that their theories become total speculation when they attempt to describe what “was” the moment just before the universe came into being.
However, their current theories suggest the universe began as/with an explosion.  Not an explosion as we may think, where something expands from a center into the space around it.  In this theory, space itself and everything we can see in it exploded into being, ostensibly from nothingness.  In simplistic terms, at one point the universe was not, then it and time began.  It is that moment of initiation of the universe that scientists think they can describe theoretically with some degree of clarity and certainty.  This scientific theory sounds very much like Genesis 1:  3, wherein it is recorded, “Then God said, ‘Let there be light’, and there was light.” Thus, science seems to be converging on or moving towards a rapprochement with the truth as it is recorded in the Bible.””

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #43

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“Truth, then, can be said to be the firmness, the ‘that which is stable’, the sureness, the ‘that which is faithful’, the ‘that which continues’, the ‘that which endures’, the ‘that which is trustworthy’, the ‘that which is steadfast’, the ‘that which is honest’ and the ‘that which is certain’; the unseen ‘that which lies at the basis of and agrees with that which we are able to see’, hear, feel, smell, touch, know.  The truth is the manifested- the made to be able to be perceived-, the veritable- the certain, the actual, the genuine, the authentic-, essence of matter.”  Matter is what scientists will tell us is what makes up the universe of which we are part and which we can see, hear, feel, smell, taste and therebyoursenses know.

It is interesting to note that, for many years, there was a perceived conflict between science and religion- well, at least between science and the Bible.  Many scientists theorized that the universe had not been created, that it just “was”.  Further, they posited that the universe was a ‘steady-state’ universe which was not changing in any way.

Now, astrophysicists and “quantum mechanics” believe that the universe did indeed have a beginning.  Their theories even suggest that they can describe the essential characteristics of the universe at its beginnings.  Steven Weinberg, PhD, Nobel Prize winner in physics for 1979, in his book, “The First Three Minutes”, lays out, in somewhat layman’s terms, the current scientific thought about the beginnings of the universe.  He makes a very interesting assertion (statement of what he believes to be the truth) about the very first moments of the existence of the universe.  Dr. Weinberg states, “Finally, the universe was filled with light.”  He goes on to say that light was the very essence of the nature of the universe at its first fractions of a second of existence.”

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #42

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“Dr. Peck’s third element of discipline is Dedication to Truth.  “What is truth?” (Pontius Pilate, A.D. 29; <st1:bcv_smarttag>John 18: 38).  If we are to be dedicated to something, we ought to know (at least!) what that something is!  We are encouraged by our Lord Jesus, “If you abide in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8: 31-32).  The Hebrew word for truth is ’emeth’, and is characterized as a feminine noun, signifying personification, that is, “this is our role, this defines the content of our character”.  It means: firmness, stability, sureness, faithfulness, continuance, enduring, trustworthy, steadfast, honest, certain.  NOTE that the Hebrew approach to the definition is to list the characteristics or attributes of the truth.  This is a different approach as contrasted with the Greek way of defining a word.  The Greek word for truth is `aletheia’.  The Greek definition for this word is “The unveiled reality lying at the basis of and agreeing with an appearance; the manifested, the veritable essence of matter.”  NOTE also that the Greek definition describes the functional, dynamic nature of the subject word, truth, as opposed to listing the characteristics of the ‘truth’, as does the Hebrew.  The seeming fundamental philosophical differences in the two approaches are not substantial, are in fact, illusory.  This can be demonstrated in that they may be combined to provide disciples with useful insights into what the ‘truth’ is, and thus enable a working understanding of the truth.  This understanding will, in turn, lend itself to the development of a practical approach to being dedicated to truth.”

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #41

From “Discipleship and Discipline”, by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“The Hebrew word for good in this reference is “Towb”, which means moral goodness as contrasted with moral evil.  It also means good, right, pleasant, beautiful, excellent, lovely, delightful, joyful, fruitful, sound, righteous, virtue.  This listing brings to mind Paul’s admonition in Philippians 4: 8, “Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, let your mind dwell on these things.”  This is the correct living of our lives.  This is the successful approach to our responsibilities as disciples.  This view sheds new light on the Lord’s command to Adam and Eve in Genesis 1: 28 to “be fruitful, and multiply”.”

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #40

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“In the same manner as James reasoned in James 2: 10, “For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all…”, so the fruit of the Spirit must be taken as a whole, “For we know that the Law is spiritual”; (Romans 7: 14a)”, being more than the sum of its parts.  This is not written to discourage; rather, it is extremely encouraging to know that in our effort, God Himself is there with us.  “Some plant and some water; but only God provides the increase.”  I Corinthians 3: 6

Many disciples often wrestle with the sovereignty of God as juxtaposed with their responsibilities as disciples.  “If God is sovereign, and He has foreknown and predestined all things, what then are my responsibilities if not less than nothing (Romans 8: 29-30)?  Can I, by fulfilling my responsibilities, change anything that God, in His sovereignty has preordained?  Why even try?”  The root of these questions is an unbelief in the sovereignty of God, a desire for self-actualization. The answer to this is that man’s responsibilities and opportunities in this life are defined by God’s Word.  Jesus said that He had come “not to abolish (change) the Law, but to fulfill.”  Micah clearly states, “He has told you, O man, what is good.  And what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, to love kindness and to walk humbly with your God?””

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #39

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005

“The same process is used in the discipling transaction, described in the succeeding verses (Deuteronomy 6: 4 – 7), providing certain and comprehensive guidance to the disciple:  “Hear, O Israel!  The Lord our God, the Lord is One (just as is the fruit of the Spirit)!   And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.  And these words, which I am commanding you today, shall be on your heart; and you shall teach them diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up.  And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand (tie a string around your finger!) and they shall be as frontals on your forehead.  And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.”   Thus, it is essential to our lives, it is the proof of our vitality, that we show forth the fruit of the Spirit as evidence that the Christ (“in Him was life, and the life was the light of men.”) dwells in us.  Without Him, we cannot be disciples or make others into disciples.  “I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit; for apart from Me you can do nothing.””

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BILL’S BLOG ENTRY #38

From “Discipleship and Discipline” by William H. Hicks, copyright March, 2005:

“No dead thing bears fruit.  It cannot pass on its life, either as a seed planted to generate new fruit, or as nourishment for one who “hungers and thirsts”. As disciples of Christ, we are charged also to multiply ourselves.  The same seed is used in each instance:  The Word of God.  The same fertilizer is also used in each instance: careful obedience to the Word of God.”

Posted in DISCIPLESHIP | Tagged | Leave a comment